Fuji's new extension tubes: To infinity and beyond

Posted on by Bill Palmer

Back in November of last year you may remember reading my views on the macro options then available for Fuji X-users.  The MCEX-11 and MCEX-16 had just been announced and I was quite excited at the prospect; indeed I wrote to Santa in the hope of waking up on Christmas morning with something tubular in my stocking.  Sadly either Santa didn't get my note in time or I was on the Naughty List, because I had to wait until mid-January before I found an MCEX-16 in stock somewhere friendly enough to give me a small but perfectly formed discount.

To briefly recap, my macro solution up to this point has been the Olympus OM 50mm f3.5 Macro lens plus some matching auto-extension tubes.  I covered the advantages and disadvantages of this setup in the previous article so I won't repeat them here.  Let's focus instead on the benefits of the MCEX solution.  The Fuji tubes are well-made; metal front, rear and all the way through - no plastic here.  As one might expect, they are the perfect aesthetic match for the Fujinon X-series lenses.  The tube itself is knurled on each side with that slightly irritating fine milling that Fuji use. It's great for gripping, but a magnet for every bit of dust and grease going.  It's about the size of the 27mm "pancake" lens but a bit lighter.  Slightly frustratingly, it comes without front and rear caps, both of which are a must in my book.

The tube comes in a small cardboard box - standard Fuji black with white script.  Inside the box are the usual warranty papers and a comprehensive and multi-lingual information sheet with the table of lens magnifications for both the 11 and 16mm tubes - really quite handy, but not quite as convenient as a PDF on the smartphone, which is what I have ended up with.

What this little table underlines is that this tube is usable with all the Fujinon lenses currently available.  There are some restrictions and caveats - more of them in a moment.  There is no mention of the Zeiss Touit lenses - particularly the 50mm Macro - but I have no reason to believe that the rings would not play nice with them.

Let's look at the fine print for a moment.  I wouldn't normally bother, but there are some important gotchas there that should be highlighted.

  1. Your lens won't focus to infinity with an MCEX ring attached.  This is commonsense - you can't fight the laws of physics after all - but there will no doubt be some who will return their rings because of this reason...
  2. The MCEX rings do work with the Leica M-Mount adaptor.  This is an unexpected bonus.
  3. Fuji says that you can't use the MCEX-11 and MCEX-16 together.  They "may malfunction" if layered; If so this is not only disappointing, but also frustrating.  I can stack my 20-odd-year-old Olympus tubes. So, if I get a chance (and another ring) I shall give this a try. I'd be surprised if it really didn't work.
  4. EXIF will not be recorded correctly; this is not the end of the world in general use, but may be a bit of an irritant for the more gear-minded.

Enough peering at paperwork. For the purposes of this exercise I mounted the MCEX-16 in between my X-T1 and the Fujinon 60mm Macro.  The huge advantage of the MCEX ring(s) over my previous macro solution is that they maintain connectivity between body and lens; autofocus and auto-exposure are available to the photographer.  Handling is exemplary as you would expect.  In order to provide a point of comparison I pointed again at my trusty Minox B sub-miniature camera, as well as the odd bit of handy flora.

Here's the bad news: Don't expect the MCEX rings to bend reality or change the laws of physics.  You are still dealing with a wafer-thin zone of focus, even at smaller apertures.  And here's a tip, by the way: If you don't want to burn through the batteries in your X-T1 even faster than the frightening usual, DON'T engage pre-af.  If you do, you will see more hunting than Boxing Day in the Shires.  Anyway, if you want to get the best out of your Macro setup, USE A TRIPOD.  Yes, I know I am "shouting" but it is all too easy to be seduced into thinking that dropping a convenient little MCEX into a corner of the gadget bag means you can rival the BBC Bristol Natural History Unit for insect candids.  You can - but only if you support your rig appropriately.  This is a roundabout way of getting to the point of saying "don't do what I do, do what I say" - these shots are hand-held, with relatively shallow DoF, and it shows.

All that said, the good news is that the MCEX-16 does exactly what it says on the tin; it gets you closer at reasonable cost and with significant convenience. It enhances the performance range of not just the 60mm Macro but also pretty well every Fujinon X-Series lens you can get your hands on. I look forward to trying it out on my other lenses. 

If you are serious (or even semi-serious) about getting closer to your subject, there really is no reason not to get an MCEX-16 (or indeed, -11).  Yes, I know there are cheaper alternatives out there, but as my old Granddad used to say, "buy cheap, buy twice".  I can never understand why you would want to stick a few quid's worth of badly milled, poor tolerance tubing in between hundreds of pounds worth of camera and lens.  

Bottom line: Get the Fuji version, it's worth it.

You can also find Bill Palmer at Rangefound and Lightmancer

∞ Permalink